It seems that issue 10301 was fixed by PR 13424, by combining the spans, however given that we don't have a lot of test coverage for RTL-text I figured that adding a simple reference test wouldn't hurt (rather than just closing the issue as WORKSFORME).
There were some links not working in some XFA files,I realized that the anchor tag that contains the link has an inline display and couldn't receive any height, solved this by adding a "position: absolute". Tested with two different files in Firefox Nightly and Chrome and now all links are working perfectly fine. Added reftest to avoid future regressions
The old method of handling soft masks had a number of issues where the temporary
drawing canvas and the suspended main canvas could get out of sync
(e.g. mismatched save/restores or clip state) or we could end up compositing at
the wrong time. A good example of things getting out sync is the reduced test
case in #9017.
To fix this I've changed two big things:
1) Duplicate all the needed graphics state from the temporary canvas to the
suspended main canvas. This ensure the canvases stay in sync so that when we
switch back to the main canvas the graphics state stack is the same
(e.g. transforms, clip paths).
2) Immediately composite after each drawing operation. This ensures that if
there's an active clip region that we'll still be able to composite the correct
portions of the canvas. Note: This solution could be avoided by using
getImageData and putImageData since those ignore clipping region, but this is
very very slow. Note2: I also think the old way of only compositing at the end
of the soft mask is incorrect and can lead to wrong colors if drawing over the
same region, but in practice this doesn't seem to matter much.
Fixes: #5781Fixes: #5853Fixes: #7267Fixes: #7891Fixes: #8403Fixes: #8624Fixes: #12798Fixes: #13891Fixes: #9017 (reduced test case)
Fixes: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1703683
Trying to render these Annotation-types, when the borderWidth is `0`, causes a "hairline" border to appear. If these Annotations included an appearance stream, as they are supposed to, this wouldn't have happened and the simplest solution here seem to be to just ignore these particular Annotations.
If a PDF included an embedded TrueType font whose preferred character
map (cmap) was in "format 2", the code would select that character map
and then refuse to read it because of an unsupported format, thus
causing the characters not to be rendered. This commit implements
support for format 2 as described at the link below.
https://developer.apple.com/fonts/TrueType-Reference-Manual/RM06/Chap6cmap.html
This is unfortunately *yet another* bug in the `preEvaluateFont`-implementation, and I've lost count of the number of times I've had to tweak this code over the years :-(
I really cannot help thinking that PR 4423 was way too simplistic, since it missed a bunch of cases that leads to broken font rendering in many PDF documents.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1734802
In the referenced bug, the embedded fonts contain custom CMap-data that only include strings. Note how for embedded composite TrueType fonts we're using the CMap-data when building the glyph mapping, and currently we end up with a completely empty map because the code expects only CID *numbers*.
Furthermore, just fixing the glyph mapping alone isn't sufficient to fully address the bug, since we also need to consider this "special" kind of CMap-data when looking up glyph widths.
- it aims to fix#14021;
- the N dict is empty here so just create a default one;
- it implies that the checked checkbox has no appearance so create a default one too in order to print it;
- in the pdf in the issue, a checked box is not printed because it has no default appearance so we need to guess its appearance from its state.
In order to implement this, we utilize the existing `bidi` function to infer the text-direction of /T and /Contents entries. While this may not be perfect in cases where one PopupAnnotation mixes LTR and RTL languages, it should work well enough in most cases.
To avoid having to add *two new* properties in lots of annotations, supplementing the existing `title`/`contents`-properties, this patch instead re-factors the existing code such that the properties are replaced by Objects (containing `str` and `dir`).
*Please note:* In order avoid breaking existing third-party implementations, `GENERIC`-builds of the PDF.js library will still provide the old `title`/`contents`-properties on annotations returned by `PDFPageProxy.getAnnotations`.
Currently we only exclude /Encoding entries that also contains a /Differences array, which is the cause of the text-selection problem in the referenced issue.
In order to address this we'll now also exclude /Encoding entries that contain one of the predefined *named* encodings, and no longer require that it also contains a /Differences array.
*Please note:* This patch cases a small "regression" in the `bug1130815-text` test-case, however this is actually an improvement when compared with Adobe Reader and PDFium (in Google Chrome).
In this particular case the `CMap`-data that we create contains only numbers, but no strings, which causes `PartialEvaluator.readToUnicode` to create a ToUnicode-map with only empty strings.
*Please note:* This is yet another case where I don't know if it's necessarily the best and most correct solution, but it does fix the referenced issue.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1722036.
- AS and V should share the same value for checkbox: it's at least what the specs say;
- the pdf in the above bug opens correctly in Acrobat so it likely means that AS is chosen over V.
*Please note:* All of this feels very handwavy, but at least it passes all tests locally. Hopefully we have enough tests for this part of the font code.
For non-embedded composite standard fonts with an "incomplete" /CIDToGIDMap, we'll now fallback to an *explicitly defined* /ToUnicode map even when that one happens to be an /Identity-H or /Identity-V map.
The `Font.fallbackToSystemFont` method is unfortunately getting more and more special-cases, however that might be unavoidable given all the weird non-embedded fonts found in the wild :-(
While some of the output looks worse to my eye, this behavior more
closely matches what I see when I open the PDFs in Adobe acrobat.
Fixes: #4706, #9713, #8245, #1344
Currently it's possible to accidentally, e.g. by simply copy-and-pasting from an existing test-case, add an unnecessary `"link": true`-entry for locally available PDF files.
This leads to inconsistencies in the manifest file, and doesn't feel like a great developer experience. However we can easily fix it by having `verifyManifestFiles` fail in this situation, and doing so actually turned up a couple of existing cases.
In the referenced PDF document the /Contents stream contains MarkedContent-operators, however no optional content dictionary exists; according to [the specification](https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G7.3883825):
> Null values or references to deleted objects shall be ignored. If this entry is
not present, is an empty array, or contains references only to null or deleted
objects, the membership dictionary shall have no effect on the visibility of
any content.
In the PDF document some of the glyphs have bogus `differences`-entries[1] that cannot be resolved to valid glyph names, thus causing the glyph mapping to fail.
My initial idea was to use a similar approach as in the `PartialEvaluator._simpleFontToUnicode`-method, to extract the charCodes from those entries, however it turned out that that didn't actually help in this case (the mapping was still wrong).
To fix this I'm thus proposing that we fallback to the /ToUnicode map when no other useable data exists (e.g. no post-table), since it *hopefully* shouldn't make things any worse than leaving parts of the glyph map empty (which currently happens).
---
[1] As can be seem below, some of the entries are completely normal while others are non-standard:
```
Differences (array)
0 = 65
1 = /g5167
2 = /space
3 = /g11927
4 = /g17737
5 = /g11540
6 = /g2180
7 = /K
8 = /P
9 = /two
10 = /zero
11 = /one
12 = /five
13 = /four
14 = /g6932
15 = /g7246
16 = /g1691
17 = /g2343
18 = /g14792
19 = /g3325
20 = /g4280
21 = /g20383
22 = /g18166
23 = /g16988
24 = /g17943
25 = /g19223
26 = /g10830
27 = 97
28 = /g982
29 = /g1226
30 = /g5059
31 = /g2677
32 = /g1042
33 = /g11568
34 = /L
35 = /three
36 = /seven
37 = /g2364
38 = /g12063
39 = /g5356
40 = /g2173
41 = /g17877
42 = /g7273
43 = /g7647
44 = /g7224
45 = /g19327
46 = /g5054
47 = /g2342
48 = /g10136
49 = /g6856
50 = /g13381
51 = /g7257
52 = /g12093
53 = /g2359
```
Despite its name, the fonts in ItcSymbol-family are "regular" fonts and not Symbol ones. However, given that the font name contains the word "Symbol" we ended up picking the wrong code-path in the `Font.fallbackToSystemFont`-method.
*Please note:* While this patch ensures that the text becomes readable, by falling back a standard font, the rendering will obviously not be perfect. However, that's the PDF generators "fault" since non-embedded fonts cannot be guaranteed to render correctly in all environments.
Currently, in the `PartialEvaluator`, we only support Optional Content in Form-/XObjects. Hence this patch adds support for Image-/XObjects as well, which looks like a simple oversight in PR 12095 since the canvas-implementation already contains the necessary code to support this.
