Improve the API unit-tests for scripting-related functionality
I happened to notice that we didn't have *any* unit-tests for either `getFieldObjects` or `getCalculationOrderIds`, on the `PDFDocumentProxy` class, which seems unfortunate since it's API functionality that we depend on in e.g. the viewer.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e42d54e1b5
commit
b99927e1ee
@ -1256,6 +1256,105 @@ describe("api", function () {
|
||||
await loadingTask.destroy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("gets non-existent fieldObjects", async function () {
|
||||
const fieldObjects = await pdfDocument.getFieldObjects();
|
||||
expect(fieldObjects).toEqual(null);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("gets fieldObjects", async function () {
|
||||
if (isNodeJS) {
|
||||
pending(
|
||||
"Node.js appears to ignore Object properties that are explicitly " +
|
||||
"set to `undefined`, thus breaking the expectations used below."
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const loadingTask = getDocument(buildGetDocumentParams("js-authors.pdf"));
|
||||
const pdfDoc = await loadingTask.promise;
|
||||
const fieldObjects = await pdfDoc.getFieldObjects();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(fieldObjects).toEqual({
|
||||
Text1: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "25R",
|
||||
value: "",
|
||||
defaultValue: null,
|
||||
multiline: false,
|
||||
password: false,
|
||||
charLimit: null,
|
||||
comb: false,
|
||||
editable: true,
|
||||
hidden: false,
|
||||
name: "Text1",
|
||||
rect: [24.1789, 719.66, 432.22, 741.66],
|
||||
actions: null,
|
||||
page: 0,
|
||||
strokeColor: null,
|
||||
fillColor: null,
|
||||
type: "text",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
Button1: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "26R",
|
||||
value: "Off",
|
||||
defaultValue: null,
|
||||
exportValues: undefined,
|
||||
editable: true,
|
||||
name: "Button1",
|
||||
rect: [455.436, 719.678, 527.436, 739.678],
|
||||
hidden: false,
|
||||
actions: {
|
||||
Action: [
|
||||
`this.getField("Text1").value = this.info.authors.join("::");`,
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
page: 0,
|
||||
strokeColor: null,
|
||||
fillColor: new Uint8ClampedArray([192, 192, 192]),
|
||||
type: "button",
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await loadingTask.destroy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("gets non-existent calculationOrder", async function () {
|
||||
const calculationOrder = await pdfDocument.getCalculationOrderIds();
|
||||
expect(calculationOrder).toEqual(null);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("gets calculationOrder", async function () {
|
||||
if (isNodeJS) {
|
||||
pending("Linked test-cases are not supported in Node.js.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const loadingTask = getDocument(buildGetDocumentParams("issue13132.pdf"));
|
||||
const pdfDoc = await loadingTask.promise;
|
||||
const calculationOrder = await pdfDoc.getCalculationOrderIds();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(calculationOrder).toEqual([
|
||||
"319R",
|
||||
"320R",
|
||||
"321R",
|
||||
"322R",
|
||||
"323R",
|
||||
"324R",
|
||||
"325R",
|
||||
"326R",
|
||||
"327R",
|
||||
"328R",
|
||||
"329R",
|
||||
"330R",
|
||||
"331R",
|
||||
"332R",
|
||||
"333R",
|
||||
"334R",
|
||||
"335R",
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
await loadingTask.destroy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("gets non-existent outline", async function () {
|
||||
const loadingTask = getDocument(
|
||||
buildGetDocumentParams("tracemonkey.pdf")
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user